MooでMooX::Types::MooseLike::Baseったら遅い件

benchはこちらのものを参考に作りなおしてます。

gist:Moose vs Mouse vs Moo

Benchmark: timing 300000 iterations of moo_direct, moo_ro, moo_rw, moose_direct, moose_ro, moose_rw, mouse_direct, mouse_ro, mouse_rw...
moo_direct:  0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.10 CPU) @ 3000000.00/s (n=300000)
            (warning: too few iterations for a reliable count)
    moo_ro:  1 wallclock secs ( 0.62 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.62 CPU) @ 483870.97/s (n=300000)
    moo_rw:  1 wallclock secs ( 0.58 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.58 CPU) @ 517241.38/s (n=300000)
moose_direct:  0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.10 CPU) @ 3000000.00/s (n=300000)
            (warning: too few iterations for a reliable count)
  moose_ro:  1 wallclock secs ( 0.68 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.68 CPU) @ 441176.47/s (n=300000)
  moose_rw:  1 wallclock secs ( 0.70 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.70 CPU) @ 428571.43/s (n=300000)
mouse_direct:  0 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.10 CPU) @ 3000000.00/s (n=300000)
            (warning: too few iterations for a reliable count)
  mouse_ro:  0 wallclock secs ( 0.21 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.21 CPU) @ 1428571.43/s (n=300000)
            (warning: too few iterations for a reliable count)
  mouse_rw:  0 wallclock secs ( 0.19 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.19 CPU) @ 1578947.37/s (n=300000)
            (warning: too few iterations for a reliable count)
                  Rate moose_rw moose_ro moo_ro moo_rw mouse_ro mouse_rw mouse_direct moose_direct moo_direct
moose_rw      428571/s       --      -3%   -11%   -17%     -70%     -73%         -86%         -86%       -86%
moose_ro      441176/s       3%       --    -9%   -15%     -69%     -72%         -85%         -85%       -85%
moo_ro        483871/s      13%      10%     --    -6%     -66%     -69%         -84%         -84%       -84%
moo_rw        517241/s      21%      17%     7%     --     -64%     -67%         -83%         -83%       -83%
mouse_ro     1428571/s     233%     224%   195%   176%       --     -10%         -52%         -52%       -52%
mouse_rw     1578947/s     268%     258%   226%   205%      11%       --         -47%         -47%       -47%
mouse_direct 3000000/s     600%     580%   520%   480%     110%      90%           --           0%        -0%
moose_direct 3000000/s     600%     580%   520%   480%     110%      90%           0%           --        -0%
moo_direct   3000000/s     600%     580%   520%   480%     110%      90%           0%           0%         --

mooseとmooがそんな変わらなくて、mouseが他の3倍速いみたいな結果になってしまった。

ちなみにMooの分だけの実装はこちら

package ClassMoo;
use Moo;
use MooX::Types::MooseLike::Base qw(:all);
has 'ro1' => ( is => 'ro', isa => Bool,      default => 1 );
has 'ro2' => ( is => 'ro', isa => Int,       default => 1 );
has 'ro3' => ( is => 'ro', isa => Str ,      default => '1' );
has 'ro4' => ( is => 'ro', isa => ArrayRef , default => sub { [] });
has 'ro5' => ( is => 'ro', isa => HashRef  , default => sub { {} });
has 'ro6' => ( is => 'ro', isa => CodeRef  , default => sub { sub {1} });
has 'rw1' => ( is => 'rw', isa => Bool,      default => 1 );
has 'rw2' => ( is => 'rw', isa => Int,       default => 1 );
has 'rw3' => ( is => 'rw', isa => Str ,      default => '1' );
has 'rw4' => ( is => 'rw', isa => ArrayRef , default => sub { [] });
has 'rw5' => ( is => 'rw', isa => HashRef  , default => sub { {} });
has 'rw6' => ( is => 'rw', isa => CodeRef  , default => sub { sub {1}  });
__PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable;
1;

(>_<)ﾑｰ

追記(2013/03/17 23:29)
なんかLingrの方でコメントされてました。
比較したらMouseよりも遅いけど、現実的には問題ない程度には遅くないってことですね。